Transition Board Meeting Notes

Tuesday, April 3, 2007

3:30 pm at the Equestrian Center Lounge

 

Present: Larry Winslow, Maren Anderson, Chuck Kayser, Dorrie Kayser, Nick Picerno, Roger Gibbons, Cristy Hunt

 

 

 Nick Piserno, Finance Committee

 

1.      The committee is still in an organizational stage.  They last met on Monday, April 2.

2.      Their prioritized task list is:

·        Architectural Review

·        Covenant and Compliance

·        Safety and Security

·        Lake

·        External Regulatory (city/county issuses)

·        Legal

3.      The committee said that covenant interpretation is an ongoing process and issues will be addressed on an as needed basis

4.      Their resource list includes:

·        Needing one official, dated set of original restrictive covenants

·        The committee needs volunteers

·        Will need stationary materials and mailing supplies (Currently they can use the office for mailing needs)

·        Will need legal advice

5.      Larry suggested that the existing attorney for Equestrian Lakes would be helpful for current issues related to the development, but moving forward as a separate entity an independent attorney would be useful to avoid any conflict of interest.

6.      Dorrie researched a list of attorneys who specialize in HOA’s – they are going to look into a specific one from Greensboro.

7.      The committee is also researching lawsuits concerning ARB issues and realize we need to have more specific timeline policies

8.      Larry suggested we send of attorneys to the Board for approval.  As a developing corporation, we should use an outside attorney.  The transition process needs legal assistance.

9.      Larry asked if the committee has considered charging fees for the plan review process.  The committee is currently defining what this plan would include.

10.  A preliminary ARB task plan was given to Larry.  The ARB is a subcommittee of the Regulatory Committee. 

11.  The ARB is trying to have a 30-day turn around for plan submittals.  This would include 2-weeks for the ARB and 2-weeks for the developer.

12.  Larry said as we put the process together, there should be volunteers to help.

13.  Also, these processes would be in the practice stages the first six months, then the second six months we should be working smoothly moving forward to the HOA.

14.  The ARB submittal form is being revised as the committee researches other community forms to incorporate into our existing form.  This will include adding a checklist.  Also when plans are submitted, the committee will ask that the application be complete.

15.  ARB meeting times for now are on an as-needed basis.  Moving forward they will not operate as an on-call committee.  They plan to have set meeting dates to review plans.

16.  The committee is creating a template for approval, denial and re-submittal letters.  They are also creating a way to explain that the ARB will not be held liable if ARB denies plans.